KCLUG

kclug@kclug.org

1 participants
3241 discussions

RE: Knoppix question
by Brian Kelsay 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

Read the post. From version 3.3 on, Knoppix auto-detects and uses Linux Swap partitions if found. No key presses. If you want to alter the disk, as I said, you have to use "noswap" so that Knoppix runs without a swap file. If you have anything mounted on the drive, you can't repartition w/ qtparted or parted. Brian Kelsay >>> Leo Mauler <> 12/30/04 01:40PM >>> True, but you have to "press keys" to use the available swap partition or to create a swap file. --- Brian Kelsay <> wrote: > >From Knoppix 3.1 or 3.3, it will search for a Linux > Swap partition and use it if available. Current > version is 3.6. You can also specify "Knoppix > noswap" at boot in case you want to repartition or > format the HDD in the PC. > > Brian Kelsay

2 1

RE: knoppix question
by Brian Densmore 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Mauler > > ... KNOPPIX boots into the GUI in 80MB > or more, though anything resource-intensive (like > OpenOffice) will slow it to a crawl. > Well crawl is a relative term. A crawl for an inchworm is far, far slower than a crawl for a Komodo dragon. I think Knoppix opening OpenOffice on a laptop with 96MB is somewhere close to inchworm slow. ;')

2 1

RE: knoppix question
by Brian Densmore 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Mauler > > --- lerninlinux(a)comcast.net wrote: > > > I have taken old parts and assembled a test system, > > I would like to know if Knoppix will boot into 256 > > mb of memory only. No hard drive, no floppy. I am > > wanting to use it as a test station for hard drives, > > (checking if they are bad and fdisking and such). > > The short answer is "yes". The stated minimum for the > GUI is 80MB, 128MB for using any Office applications > (such as OpenOffice). I think 64MB allows you to boot > into text mode. 256MB is ample RAM for running > KNOPPIX. > 64 MB needed for text only mode Linux!? That is an insane number! Text only Linux should be able to run in 4MB, or even 1 MB. Or hey how about in 64KB? Or <shudder> even 16KB? Nobody will ever need more than 1MB of RAM... JMHO, Brian D.

2 1

RE: knoppix question
by Brian Kelsay 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

>From Knoppix 3.1 or 3.3, it will search for a Linux Swap partition and use it if available. Current version is 3.6. You can also specify "knoppix noswap" at boot in case you want to repartition or format the HDD in the PC. Brian Kelsay >>> "Brian Densmore" <> 12/13/04 08:48AM >>> I've booted Knoppix on my laptop which only has 96MB RAM. I didn't touch any keys to do this. Now to be fair there is a swap partition on the drive and it may have seen this and used it. In fact the creators would be foolish not to look for and use it.

2 1

RE: knoppix question
by Brian Densmore 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

I've booted Knoppix on my laptop which only has 96MB RAM. I didn't touch any keys to do this. Now to be fair there is a swap partition on the drive and it may have seen this and used it. In fact the creators would be foolish not to look for and use it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Kelsay > > It will boot into 128MB w/ no swap. It's a little slower at > 128, but useable. 256 should be fine. I don't know what the > low end ram is. One possible Knoppix problem is the large > number of daemons that auto start at boot. > > Brian Kelsay > > >>> <lerninlinux(a)comcast.net> 12/12/04 11:37PM >>> > I have taken old parts and assembled a test system, I would > like to know if Knoppix will boot into 256 mb of memory only. > No hard drive, no floppy. I am wanting to use it as a test > station for hard drives, (checking if they are bad and > fdisking and such). > Your need sounds more like a task for Tom's rootboot (tomsrtbt). Why waste all that effort in launching knoppix? Tomsrtbt is surely much faster loading and is tuned for such tasks.

4 3

knoppix question
by lerninlinux＠comcast.net 30 Dec '04

30 Dec '04

I have taken old parts and assembled a test system, I would like to know if Knoppix will boot into 256 mb of memory only. No hard drive, no floppy. I am wanting to use it as a test station for hard drives, (checking if they are bad and fdisking and such). Thanks

5 4

Linux PVR
by Jonathan Hutchins 29 Dec '04

29 Dec '04

Anybody out there have a Linux Personal Video Recorder, or is anybody working on one? Any links or advice?

6 8

RE: Lexar Secure Jumpdrives [and Linux support]
by Brian Densmore 28 Dec '04

28 Dec '04

On a new note. I contacted Lexar and told them I needed the software and they sent me the software for Linux, Mac and Windows. So there is a way to use the Lexar JD secure under Linux. Not that I would consider an XOR security algorithm secure. So Lexar encryption hardware does appear to be compatible with Linux. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Densmore > Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 12:20 PM > To: kclug(a)kclug.org > Subject: RE: Lexar Secure Jumpdrives > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Clinton > > > > ... The Lexar encryption hardware is not compatible > > with Linux; it's > > done in hardware and, IIRC, it's extremely simple (easy to > > crack) but no > > device driver exists. ... > > Well this is at least partly not true. Linux did recognize the > device and both the fat16 partition and the encrypted partition. > Unfortunately, I played around with it and couldn't delete the > partitions and rebuild it from inside Linux. I also managed to delete > all files on the drive and can no longer access the hidden partition > in Windows. Although, Linux now sees it as one fat16 partition and > on Linux partition. I may have to google or call Lexar to find out how > to wipe of the hidden partition. So what I have now is one Windows > usable partition and 2 Linux usable partitions. Strange, fdisk and > cfdisk both have no problem is deleting the partitions and > creating a new > one and saving the new partition table. But, once I exit > fdisk or cfdisk > it goes back to the way it was before. > > > Brian Densmore > _______________________________________________ > Kclug mailing list > Kclug(a)kclug.org > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug >

1 0

RE: Lexar Secure Jumpdrives
by Brian Densmore 27 Dec '04

27 Dec '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Clinton > > ... The Lexar encryption hardware is not compatible > with Linux; it's > done in hardware and, IIRC, it's extremely simple (easy to > crack) but no > device driver exists. ... Well this is at least partly not true. Linux did recognize the device and both the fat16 partition and the encrypted partition. Unfortunately, I played around with it and couldn't delete the partitions and rebuild it from inside Linux. I also managed to delete all files on the drive and can no longer access the hidden partition in Windows. Although, Linux now sees it as one fat16 partition and on Linux partition. I may have to google or call Lexar to find out how to wipe of the hidden partition. So what I have now is one Windows usable partition and 2 Linux usable partitions. Strange, fdisk and cfdisk both have no problem is deleting the partitions and creating a new one and saving the new partition table. But, once I exit fdisk or cfdisk it goes back to the way it was before. Brian Densmore

1 0

First Quarter Meeting Official Confirmation
by Monty J. Harder 24 Dec '04

24 Dec '04

I got the confirmation from Marty Sorensen at the library of the following reservations: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 Tuesday, January 18, 2005 Wednesday, February 02, 2005 Tuesday, February 15, 2005 Wednesday, March 02, 2005 Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:30 pm - 8:45 pm Linux User Group (Confirmed) Meeting Room 312

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

KCLUG